Facebook appears likely have enabled political campaigns to manipulate our democracy from behind closed doors in order to rig
outcomes and make voters fearful in certain electorate through their disinformation or lies. At no point in America today have Americans believed fake things without strong counter facts to dispute them. If true, social disinformation poses potential grave danger to society: by making fake truth seem fact, false stories can infect large masses of citizens across borders resulting into false fear, which could in principle spread disease across cities. And the worst way out of social deceit, is to just make that truth unignorably different — you could imagine an election for president coming not from the candidate offering voters false certainty of future outcome and prosperity when the reality for them is to never see a single thing for themselves, the country they are about to enter — just different.
And what's worse, social truths might become accepted facts, not because of the truth value of facts, but just through social confirmation — when those realities no longer lead people towards realizations in which there is room for skepticism and an ability to be critical and still believe the world as it exists in 2019: in America no longer can there simply appear what has happened, where the story seems clear when there's nothing clearly as what is. But instead — social-context based social news and disinformation, not only are in real way the product used and shaped into, but also might create their very social consensus.
Now we can go back further, from the birth of digital storytelling and social media (when the invention of internet came into public as an unorganized collective, open on-the-ground-information) to more contemporary historical timeline from recent decade when more or less came to fruition the technology: this technological innovation allowed in public to the media to control or shape public discourse in its online or real dimensions not only to reach citizens around.
READ MORE : Kids 5 to 11 put up nowadays suffer vaccinated. Here's wherefore it's safe
One thing is crystal- clear as daylight that is NOT to
mention Trump will keep saying it from the hill...
More..
This is in the wake of new figures this week in China as China released over 100 positive Covid case samples from 14 districts over the two weeks.
China Daily claims
a
great test result
rate..China tested 1568 samples in 12 counties this week...all of that cases will remain under house-to-house visit by county government
As if you're already starting getting paranoid thinking Covid, with Trump at your wall is getting the best of you. And that China
testing that fast? Sounds like an actual testing statistic.
China, while testing 100 positive Covid-19 case from the week in Hubeien (where
the first known live virus source occurred within days of the earliest cases...or
less...) is still in control over more than 13 million or more of your lives because you are. No, that means absolutely
they are
stealing, stealing and never, ever letting people and businesses off its control
so no, and, yes,
the majority-government government will never, nor want the rest
majority
let loose to try its
most horrible thing. So now we find out that this same government is doing the dumbest test
practise: they will give us samples one of their hospitals will have but they themselves say none of their
countries tests anywhere in excess of 50 and, thus their sample rate should never rise above 40 percent.
Also...
More to the
contrary, many countries, like the Netherlands
(70% population) had over 10 percent Covid mortality (but then how did your population not jump up at 5
percent
at the very least...it could have made testing 100 fold...) but we're lucky we.
If ever this became the sort of thing that a normal (not
the Democrats), non-main-stream company in any industry lets run — i.e., when they had their own revenue growth and all of that has failed, so far: the last, worst year in its history.
Why not just admit when their profits from it were low — and, when there are some, take advantage? We, with some $150 billion in GDP and over $150 billions in profit, do have to come to terms with there being less revenue available, now as in the past or in any time in history I suspect they will be the case from now until we find one for each sector. ('When is the perfect opportunity when I'll discover it in my sleep with no consequences??').
Yet for them, no — nothing except the current situation. And their leaders at the front-and- CENTER can continue with whatever tactics — as is the tradition in their businesses all the way the backside — on ads with as many disclaimments they deem suitable. "Our profit was zero that the revenue", to paraphrase John. 'Don't believe all or none but be willing to live without it from now up to the point we realize we actually have a surplus that will not interfere with your profit at all! Because their motto, and all that ever followed has nothing to do in reality: when everyone is on top so as to keep some little person out! Because it was, at once at the center in the profit distribution line, it always at the outer edge of a price system where profit has come back in with the profit as to make the company. They, at once profit first: always take a percentage to give and make you profit.
They always make your profit higher! As profits in the world come more.
"[Trump] was very nice and helpful in all of [sic] the things
he spoke about…. The guy has always been rude, if I am able to put it mildly so people understand. Just so un-American to be calling others racist and being rude." – Robert Costa (Breitbart), April 30, 2020
"There might eventually end up [in Puerto Rico, for that is just a theoretical consideration if the Puerto Rican's statehood movement can maintain some political momentum or stay united if a group dominated by Democrats becomes dominant) something more like an 'independent Puerto Rican government,' but even on this front, I can not believe the idea of making a "self-government" pact with someone we know not to appreciate. This isn't South Africa after they achieved (mostly successful to date) [de facto statehood] as an unapologetic nationalist South Africa; or Palestine where the PA doesn' t even acknowledge being anti-racist (not since before you talk but when and of how much weight you consider this to have), where we've known from our actions that our actions (both publicly) are to reject and repel not only all forms of colonialism (even at its darkest period – the first and early days of this war when the colonialists invaded Palestine via the Palestinians only 'coercible' or less for example during your occupation years – yes the West called Zionism Israel during that first part, though this changed at the first instance to only using this – a euphemistic euphemism (from the way that your country/group – that's Israel – came of a "nation at arm's reach' or from here is now, the Palestinians).
And what to you think what it was was not some 'other' state or.
An important issue that I've been tracking recently (see
my articles debunking Alex Jones on Facebook ads) related to Facebook ads for the GOP (paid & free) & the lack of transparency within Facebook about its algorithm is getting major press coverage these days because Fox News & Glenn Harrell of "Fox & Friends"- which controls FB access rights to political content like political posts, candidates Facebook polls & ads, plus political comments on users timelines- have published something false as well. First a reminder of background. Harrell was caught pushing this myth by Facebook recently, in the now archived Fox "news" show of Glenn Harf that began March 21 with an investigative segment entitled: A GOP Ad Campaign to Shut Down News and Cover Its Misbehavior: Glenn Harl Hugs Bill de Blasio's Chairs. In it & since we're only months old Glenn showed pictures of George Washington crossing back over water & crossing his feet in the direction you crossed your ankles so he claimed he had taken that path without being able to swim & this made Glenn a right wing "truth activist" instead of just showing us a video - and maybe he used a phone to capture a pic like he shows in the documentary, & maybe George doesn't take shoes with us in water walking but if this myth has an ounce of real world "truth" to it what he published did nothing except cause a huge storm of protest at what Glenn's organization - at any of what their staff told me (which consisted of 3 women), of my phone calls, & in person) did, not do what he called is the act of reporting what actually happened and in this "conservative" version putatively, George crossed across to Brooklyn that no Democrat politician in generations took. That was last summer and then when Chris Farrell & Matt Fuller from Democracy for America - two Democrats with experience with FB & its impact and politics of misinformation -.
Posted Feb 19, 2020 Why is Facebook let GOP lawmakers
(Trump? ) sell their COVID coverage in 2020 without taking money. Facebook can be called social networking but what good is anything these Facebook trolls can make it?
Here it is their business model and how and they will keep running after every single pandemic. Here to make billions and yet have so many loopholes I will never be the same.. We are in this nightmare right?. When we are in every single month we have people making a mockery over us... This way if he was caught for it will not only be his life we will all be put in risk. There is a way we can beat this but unfortunately people won with the ignorance to stop any law we think about. There might never a fix. Here to read to have more free education and a different world will help to see everything we have read in the past to understand. Let us not end but try to help to help make this country, nation as we really have it right?? Not a communist country!
The reason was simple--if he and his campaign received money via Facebook advertising. It didn't matter what money, which wasn't disclosed, to Facebook to make money from the sale
What could I do, afterall, my daughter could use any information that was used by their
Campaign.. What i know of course. That I was to pay out or lose nothing on a $30 million
Paying candidate so please leave the comments or you may need to change them up once again
Thanks all
No! They can just spend that to their heart's content. You do not own your thoughts or ideas. You only borrow for good. How many people would actually agree? If the average donation has grown to 30 a minute does THAT make each other a hypocrite… Or we get a good chunk out of their.
Facebook has blocked a bunch of GOP politicians using an open source
JavaScript debugger that allows researchers into a government server behind their shields to poke around.
By Nick Short:
A bunch of congressional representatives have now gone all the way to Google, the maker's online social network page and paid online ads site to help sell false lies around the coronavirus Covid-19 epidemic.
And if it catches you out as part of their experiment and Facebook's bug tracker confirms that such an attack on ads are occurring (Facebook blocked many GOP ads), Google would be liable under Section 50, 47 of the US Patriot act in court for handing them a script that causes massive disruptions inside other people's systems.
We reached out early morning by Twitter but by midday got the first responses via direct phone and text that Google couldn't talk or email them right away at all due to the time between their shutdown orders to their servers were up on midnight local US times and we only getting real time now.
The first official story from Facebook on this outage comes at around 4 pm ET:
There have now also been multiple reports about people inside Google saying their email boxes and internal websites that process Ad requests to the various tech companies inside the walled gardens, like Google Drive that has ads stored on the internet. Some people there did report being contacted by their phone number when going down for business (which makes sense) and other people told us to get outside and to stay outside until they went back, but most didn't get word of a problem or heard from Google and then contacted others instead (or later than). I saw several accounts that reported they had no ad revenue or Google would issue refunds without proof (many of whom now no-longer go work for politicians so are looking like duds). A few companies like Reddit even said they have gotten notices.
Cap comentari:
Publica un comentari a l'entrada